Skip to content
edumaterial.netChange language

Back to Spanish

The city on a map

CEFR C15 turns

Listen to the conversation

Listen as many times as you like. No limit and no score.

Questions

You answer them by listening. If you slip, we tell you where it is.

  1. The speaker regards the first map’s impersonal character as potentially useful.

    True — Its distance from an individual history enables orientation; he cautions against equating that distance with coldness.

  2. Why does the speaker hesitate over calling the second map “more human”?

    The label simplifies a comparison of different kinds of usefulness. — The phrase settles the comparison too quickly and overlooks the first map’s useful distance. A map’s distance from an individual story can be useful. He does not equate it with ignorance, and he later asks for attribution rather than trusting anonymous notes more.

  3. What problem arises from treating the pencil notes as general instructions?

    Context-specific needs are imposed on people with different routines. — The notes reflect a body and routine; universalising them imposes that context on others. The warning concerns scope, not legibility or removing accounts.

  4. Why does the speaker welcome experiences that contradict the pencil notes?

    They can reveal limits of the viewpoint behind those notes. — The notes are tied to a particular body and routine. Other, even conflicting, experiences expose that limited perspective rather than providing a definitive replacement map.

  5. The closing proposal gives the annotated map authority to replace the general one.

    False — He retains clear lines and adds attributed, dated notes. He rejects making one map discredit the other or treating the result as definitive.

  6. Why include the origin and date of the added notes?

    To let readers judge their relevance and check them themselves. — The closing purpose is to help the next user decide what to use and what to verify. Attribution helps readers assess the notes; it does not dispense with checking or establish a route ranking.

Words you may not know

  • cuestaslope; hill
  • carritosmall wheeled cart; pushchair
  • situadalocated in a particular context
  • desautoricediscredit
  • procedencome from
Show the transcript

Open it once you've had a go: reading it first turns this into a reading exercise.

A Sobre mi mesa hay dos planos de la misma ciudad. En uno, las calles parecen líneas limpias entre manchas de color. En el otro, alguien ha añadido a lápiz una cuesta difícil, un banco a la sombra y una esquina donde cuesta cruzar. Ninguno contiene una ciudad distinta.

A Sería fácil decir que el segundo es más humano. La expresión queda bien, pero resuelve demasiado deprisa la comparación. El primer plano permite orientarse sin conocer la historia de quien lo dibujó. Esa distancia, que podemos confundir con frialdad, también es una forma de utilidad.

A Las notas del segundo dependen de un cuerpo y de una rutina. La cuesta importa a quien lleva un carrito; la sombra, a quien sale a mediodía. Si tomo esas marcas como instrucciones universales, convierto una experiencia situada en una norma para personas cuya jornada transcurre de otro modo.

A Eso no vuelve las notas irrelevantes. Al contrario: muestran qué preguntas no hace el plano general. Nos invitan a buscar otras experiencias, incluso las que contradicen la primera. Una esquina cómoda para esperar puede ser incómoda para atravesarla.

A Quizá el error sea pedir a uno de los planos que desautorice al otro. Yo conservaría las líneas claras y añadiría las notas, indicando de quién proceden y cuándo se escribieron. No para obtener el plano definitivo, sino para que la próxima persona sepa qué puede aprovechar y qué tendrá que comprobar con sus propios pasos.

Continue along this corridor

Next audio →