Skip to content
edumaterial.netChange language

Back to French

Si clauses: real, imagined and past conditions

CEFR B1

What you will learn

  • Match each degree of reality to its tense pair: present, imperfect or pluperfect after si.
  • Distinguish conditional si from interrogative si meaning whether.

Before you start

  • Recognise the present, imperfect, pluperfect, future and conditional; identify the clause that introduces a condition.

The idea

In the three patterns studied here, the tense immediately after conditional si helps identify how the speaker presents the condition: open, imagined or past counterfactual.

For a real or open condition, use “si + present”. The result can be present, simple future or imperative according to meaning: “si tu viens, on dîne”; “si tu viens demain, nous sortirons”; “si tu viens, appelle-moi”.

For an imagined present or future situation, use “si + imperfect” and “present conditional”: “si j’avais plus de temps, je lirais davantage”. The imperfect does not place the event in the past here; it marks distance from reality.

For a past condition that can no longer be fulfilled, use “si + pluperfect” and “past conditional”: “si nous avions réservé, nous aurions eu une table”. Both compound tenses place condition and result in an alternative past.

The practical rule is precise: in the three conditional patterns covered here, conditional si meaning “if/in the event that” is not followed by the simple future or conditional. Do not extend that rule to interrogative si meaning “whether”: “je ne sais pas s’il viendra” allows a future because it is not a condition.

These three patterns are a working foundation, not an inventory of every possible combination and nuance in si constructions.

Working paradigm

ReadingSi-clausePossible result
opensi + présentprésent / futur / impératif
imaginedsi + imparfaitconditionnel présent
past counterfactualsi + plus-que-parfaitconditionnel passé

The result may come first; the tense pairing does not change.

How it sounds

  • Si nous avions réservé, nous aurions eu une table.The opportunity has passed. The unfulfilled condition takes the pluperfect: “si nous avions réservé”. The alternative result takes the past conditional: “nous aurions eu”.
  • Je ne sais pas si Léa viendra demain.The direct question calls for a yes/no answer. Je ne sais pas turns it into an indirect question. Here si means whether, so the future viendra remains.
Three paths: real rain leads to an umbrella, imagined time leads to books, and a missed train leaves a faded past route.
Each row represents a different degree of reality and requires a different tense pair.

Match each situation to its pattern

View the illustration

Match each complete sentence to the reading and tense pair it demonstrates.

Answer available without interaction

Answer: Si tu as faim, prends une pomme. → open · si + présent → impératif; Si j’étais libre demain, je viendrais avec vous. → imagined · si + imparfait → conditionnel présent; Si nous avions réservé, nous aurions eu une table. → past counterfactual · si + plus-que-parfait → conditionnel passé

The full tense pair, not one isolated word, determines all three matches.

Spot the analysis that confuses two uses of si

A learner analyses “Je ne sais pas si Léa viendra demain”. Identify the only faulty step and choose its correction.

Choose an answer

Answer available without interaction

Answer: Because si appears, viendra must be replaced by vient. → Keep viendra: interrogative si allows the future.

The future viendra is correct because si introduces an indirect whether-question here.

When it doesn't hold

What breaks the rule, said out loud. Hiding it is what makes you feel cheated in the exam.

  • ConditionS’il vient demain, nous sortirons.
  • Indirect questionJe ne sais pas s’il viendra demain.

What your own language pushes you to say

Wrong Si j’aurais plus de temps, je voyagerais.

Right Si j’avais plus de temps, je voyagerais.

The conditional belongs in the imagined result; the condition uses the imperfect. Non-standard patterns in other languages may suggest “si j’aurais”, but the French pair is fixed.

Challenge: three conditions and one question

Complete and justify: “Si tu ___ (avoir) le temps, appelle-moi”; “Si j’___ (être) libre, je viendrais”; “Si nous ___ (partir) plus tôt, nous aurions pris le train”; “Je ne sais pas si elle ___ (venir) demain”.

Answer available without interaction
  • Use the present before the imperative result.
  • Use the imperfect with the present conditional and the pluperfect with the past conditional.
  • Identify interrogative si before deciding whether the future is possible.

Answer: as · étais · étions partis · viendra

The first three sentences use present, imperfect and pluperfect after si; the fourth keeps the future because si introduces an indirect question.

Curriculum alignment and sources

Continue along this corridor

Practise this: After si, never the futureFrench subjunctive: forms, triggers and contrast with the indicativePast participle agreement: auxiliary, object and positionReported speech: person, tense and viewpointOn and the passive: choosing sentence focusSpoken and written French: adapting register